IBM and Hitachi offer a variety of flash array options. Both companies have a broad flash portfolio offering a variety of different price/performance scenarios. What will be your initial cost and your Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for either vendor? How will your performance change as you add concurrent data streams and users?

IBM Product Options

  • IBM FlashSystem A9000R 2 Grid Elements
  • IBM FlashSystem A9000R 3 Grid Elements
  • IBM FlashSystem A9000R 4 Grid Elements
  • IBM FlashSystem A9000R 5 Grid Elements
  • IBM FlashSystem A9000R 6 Grid Elements
  • IBM FlashSystem A9000
  • IBM FlashSystem V9000 (Capacity)
  • IBM FlashSystem V9000 (Performance)
  • IBM FlashSystem 9010
  • IBM FlashSystem 9150
  • IBM FlashSystem 900
  • IBM DS8888 24-core
  • IBM DS8888 48-core
  • IBM DS8888 Gen 2 24-core
  • IBM DS8888 Gen 2 48-core
  • IBM DS8882F
  • IBM DS8884F Gen 2
  • IBM DS888F Gen 2-Phase 1
  • IBM DS886F Gen 2-Phase 3
  • IBM DS888F Gen 2 24-Core
  • IBM DS888F Gen 2 48-Core
  • IBM 5010F
  • IBM 5020F
  • IBM 5030F
  • IBM 7700F

Hitachi Product Options

  • Hitachi VSP F1500
  • Hitachi VSP F800
  • Hitachi VSP F600
  • Hitachi VSP F400
  • Hitachi VSP G1500
  • Hitachi VSP G1000
  • Hitachi VSP G800
  • Hitachi VSP G600
  • Hitachi VSP G400
  • Hitachi VSP G200
  • Hitachi HUS VM All Flash

Learn More:

Compare any of the 30+ flash options in a matter of minutes, and find the one that offers you the optimal price/performance/TCO result.

CIOview Top Ten Considerations:

Each customer and workload requirements are unique, but in general be aware that not all of these products:

  1. Has an optimized hardware path for flash
  2. Does not have a 4KB boundary write performance penalty, or a 512KB re-write performance cost
  3. Offer compression and or deduplication
  4. Provide a rich software environment
  5. Feature a suite of management tools
  6. Has a world-class write amplification function
  7. Can be dynamically expanded without disruption
  8. Will function at a high utilization rate
  9. Allows Flash and conventional drives to be mixed
  10. If you select a solution that has “over-implicit provisioning”, buyer beware, you should know a great deal about the workload under consideration

Disclaimer: TCOnow! for IBM Flash vs Hitachi Flash uses the best available public pricing information available. Every effort is made to keep these prices current. However, CIOview is not legally responsible for the timing or accuracy of the prices or performance of any system and/or component of any system. The sole responsibility for information use provided by TCOnow! products rests solely with the user of this information.